Marx-Engels Subject Archive
Marx and Engels on Philosophy
Early Philosophical Works.
Marx: 1841 - 1845
Engels’ response to Friedrich Schelling’s attack on Hegel, 1841. This work is recommended for the seasoned student of philosophy only. Wrriten before Engels had met Karl Marx, this is the earliest glimpse of how Marx and Engels arrived at their own approach to critique of Hegel’s philosophy.
For comments on this see The Expurgation of Hegelianism by Andy Blunden, 1999
Entitled “The Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature”, this work is recommended for the seasoned student of philosophy only. In promoting Epicurus as against Democritus, we the young Marx already searching for a critique of Hegel. At the same time, in his exploration of these philosophers, Marx shows a profound understanding of the contradiction between the immediately given world of sense perception and the essence of our human relation with Nature.
For a short commentary on this see Marx’s Critique of Hegel by Cyril Smith, 1999
Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Marx, 1843
Marx has copied each paragraph from the section of Hegel’s work on the State and written his annotations and commentary on it. This work shows the early development of Marx's criticism of Hegel, inspired by Ludwig Feuerbach, but with the outlines of his own critique beginning to appear.
Marx further develops these ideas in On the Jewish Question, and you can read
Hegel's Philosophy of Right and other commentaries on Hegel's theory of the state:
Hegel's First System, Herbert Marcuse 1941; Hegel's Theory of the Modern State, Shlomo Avineri, 1972; Hegel's philosophy of State, Z Pelczynski, 1984; The Young Hegel, 1938
Economic & Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844:
This is the first statement of Marx's critique of political economy. If you were to read only one article on philsoophy, this would be it. In this work Marx shows how money intervenes in the relation of person to person and establishes itself as an independent power over and above people, but nevertheless is nothing but a human power. These ideas are further developed in the 1844 Manuscripts which follow, eventually finding their mature form in Capital. These manuscripts were not deciphered until 1932.
Preface to Philosophical Manuscripts
Private Property and Communism
Human Requirements and Division of Labour
The Power of Money
Critique of the Hegelian Dialectic and Philosophy as a Whole
In the course of these manuscripts, Marx develops his critique of Hegel and of Ludwig Feuerbach and marks out the main outlines of his conception of communism. These are not easy reading, but you should return to them time and again as you learn more and more about Marxism
On the Jewish Question, 1844
This work is important for understanding the foundations of Marx’s view of history, the state and society.
This work comes out of Marx's earlier Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. See: Hegel's Theory of the Modern State by Shlomo Avineri, and Marx's Theory of Alienation by István Mészáros.
See also, for a contrary view, Althusser on “The problem of Marx’s early works”
The Holy Family, 1845
This very polemical work written by Marx and Engels against the ‘Young Hegelians’ is hard going, but contains some readable passages. Try chapters II and III, and for a very brief history of philosophical materialism see Chapter VI
Theses on Feuerbach, 1845
In this single most famous and important work of Marx on philosophy, Marx puts forward 11 short theses defining the foundations of his view of human knowledge, practice and history.
The German Ideology, Karl Marx & Frederick Engels, 1845
This work was never completed or published. Its early chapters contain important statements of Marx and Engels’ position on philosophical materialism, method of investigation, history, class, revolution, etc., etc. The remainder of the work is scattered with gems on subjects as diverse and language, technology, agriculture, etc., etc.
Letter to Annenkov, 1846
Famous letter cautioning against mechanical or formal conceptions of “productive forces” and explaining his dialectical approach to the conception of these relations.
See The Violence of Abstraction: 2 Productive Forces, by Derek Sayer (1987).
Wage Labour and Capital, 1847
In this first systematic elaboration of his critique of political economy, Marx develops the basic concepts. Chapter 5 in particular makes it clear how Marx understands the concepts of political economy as a mystification of the relationships between people.
Hegel, Economics, and Marx's Capital by Cyril Smith (1998)
Preparatory work and early chapters of Capital.
Marx: 1852 - 1867
This study of the French Revolution marks a definitive point in the development of Marx and Engels' understanding of history and in particular the nature and position of the bourgeoisie. The first chapter in particular contains some famous formulations of the principles of historical materialism.
A speech by Marx where he outlines in a popular form his ideas about the conflict between the productive forces and the relations of production.
This is Marx’s preparatory work for Capital. When it was first published until 1953 and translated into English in 1973, it was a bombshell, for it showed irrefutably that as late as 1857, Marx was still working through Hegel's concepts in the development of his analysis of bourgeois society. Almost 1,000 pages long and barely structured it is not an easy read. However, there are a number of passages which clarify Marx's views on a range of important methodological problems.
The following chapters are of particular interest:
See Marx's Grundrisse and Hegel's Logic by Hiroshi Uchida (1988),
Dialectics of the Abstract & the Concrete in Marx's Capital by Ilyenkov
This Preface contains one of Marx’s most famous and succinct statement of his view of history and the meaning of philosophical materialism.
See Relations of Production, by Derek Sayer (1987).
Capital, I, 1867
The First four chapters include a number of important observations on philosophy, and the Afterword contains a well-known statement of Marx's relation to Hegel.
For various commentaries on philosophical aspects of Capital see:
Dialectics of the Abstract & the Concrete in Marx's Capital by Ilyenkov (1960), Marx's Capital, Philosophy and Political Economy by Geoff Pilling (1980), The Logic of Marx's Capital, by Tony Smith (1990)
Engels: 1878 - 1886
Eighty per cent of this book is made up of exceedingly boring refutations of the views of the now long-forgotten Eugen Dühring. However, in winding up on each theme, Engels puts forward his own view, often in extremely succinct and highly readable form. The sections below deal with some classic themes.
To get an idea of the controversy around some of Engels' formulations in this work see Leninist Dialectics & Metaphysics of Positivism, Ilyenkov 1979, Subject & Object In Hegel, Lukacs 1923, The Dogmatic Dialectic and the Critical Dialectic, Jean-Paul Sartre, 1960, Contradiction and Overdetermination, Louis Althusser, 1962.
On Dialectics, 1878
This pamphlet is a classic text, obligatory for all students of Marxism.
Short sketch of the Marxist conception of social class.
Dialectics of Nature, 1883
In this controversial book by Engels, he explains the basic ideas of dialectics by demonstrating how these relationships are manifested in our understanding of Nature.
Refer to the same works cited above in relation to Anti-Dühring, and the archive of a discussion list which includes a discussion around dialectics of nature.
This pamphlet, written by Engels after Marx's death, is probably the most readable, comprehensive and profound of Marx & Engels’ expositions of philosophy. The chapter on Feuerbach is not too interesting for us nowadays, but the other three together constitute a short three-part lesson in Marxist Philosophy.
Refer to the Ludwig Feuerbach Internet Archive.
Letters on Dialectics, 1844 - 1895
Engels’ fight against simplistic interpretations of Marx.
Engels: 1890 - 1894
Letter cautioning against metaphysical, formal or utopian conceptions of socialism.
Letter to J. Bloch, 1890
Famous letter cautioning against exaggerated or one-sided understanding of Marx's views on the materialist conception of history.
Letter to Starkenburg, 1894
Letter cautioning against a deterministic interpretation of historical materialism.